Perdomo-Gonzalez

Perdomo-Gonzalez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202423-1953California891 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 19 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID PERDOMO-GONZALEZ; No. 23-1953

NORA DEL CARMEN CARDONA-

MENDOZA; M.E.P.C.; D.E.P.C., Agency Nos.

A240-196-226

Petitioners, A240-196-227

A240-196-228

v. A240-196-229

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 2, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, BERZON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners David Perdomo-Gonzalez (“Perdomo”), Nora del Carmen

Cardona-Mendoza (“Cardona”), and their children M.E.P.C and D.E.P.C. seek

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. removal, and relief under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.