Williams v. Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 2024B327546California5,581 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 12/19/24 Williams v. Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

EBONY WILLIAMS, B327546

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 21STCV04275)

LAW OFFICES OF TODD M.

FRIEDMAN, P.C. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Maurice A. Leiter, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Neal S. Zaslavsky and Neal S. Zaslavsky for Plaintiff and Appellant. Kaufman Dolowich, Barry Z. Brodsky, Steve R. Belilove, and Rosely George for Defendants and Respondents.

_________________________ Ebony Williams appeals from a judgment entered after the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.