Ramadan
(PC) Penate v. Ramadan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT MAURICIO PENATE, No. 1:24-cv-01315-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
v. (ECF No. 13) AMR H. RAMADAN,
Defendant.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 31, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed a response on November 15, 2024. (ECF No. 9.) On November 19, 2024, Findings and Recommendations were issued recommending dismissal of the action, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 11.) On December 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal of this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (ECF No. 13.) /// 28 “[UJnder Rule 41(a)(1)(), a plaintiff has an absolute…