Stampfli

Stampfli v. Susanville Sanitary District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20242:20-cv-01566California854 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 DEBORAH STAMPFLI, an individual, No. 2:20-cv-01566 WBS DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES1

SUSANVILLE SANITARY DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of California; STEVE J. STUMP, in his individual and official capacities; JOHN MURRAY, in his individual and official capacities; ERNIE PETERS, in his individual and official capacities; DAVID FRENCH, in his individual and official capacities; KIM ERB, in his individual and official capacities; MARTY HEATH, in his individual and official capacities; DOES I-V, inclusive;

BLACK & WHITE CORPORATIONS I-V;

and ABLE & BAKER COMPANIES, inclusive, 24 Defendants. 25

The motion is decided on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The scheduled January 6, 2025 hearing on the motion is hereby VACATED. ----oo0oo---- On May 16, 2024, the Ninth Circuit affirmed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.