Valencia

(PC) McClintock v. Valencia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20242:22-cv-01884California1,049 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MCCLINTOCK, No. 2:22-cv-1884 KJM CSK P

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

G. VALENCIA, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On December 4, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion styled “Motion for Admissions,” and on December 13, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion styled “Motion [for] Public Records’ Disclosure of each Defendant.” (ECF Nos. 35, 38.) As discussed below, plaintiff’s motions are denied. I. BACKGROUND This case proceeds on the following claims: (1) First Amendment retaliation claims as to defendants G. Valencia, L. Cantu, and T. Cooper (claims one, two and ten); (2) Plaintiff’s claim that defendants Weaver, Luther and Hadden confiscated and destroyed a box of plaintiff’s legal materials in retaliation for plaintiff pursuing litigation as evidenced by the materials in the box that were clearly labeled (claims five, six and seven); and (3) Plaintiff’s claim that in August of 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.