Belyea

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIZABETH BELYEA, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01693-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: SEALING MOTIONS

v. 9 Dkt. Nos. 235, 242, 246, 247, 253, 255, 258, GREENSKY, INC., et al., 262, 266, 268 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs filed administrative motions to consider whether documents GreenSky designated as confidential should be filed under seal. (Dkt. Nos. 235 (class certification motion); 255 (Daubert opposition); 258 (class certification reply); 266 (summary judgment opposition).) Because GreenSky did not respond, the motions are DENIED without prejudice. Civ. L.R. 79– 5(f) (“Within 7 days of the motion’s filing, the Designating Party must file a statement and/or declaration” as described in Local Rule 79-5(c)). Accompanying its briefs, GreenSky filed motions for leave to file documents under seal. (Dkt. Nos. 242 (class certification opposition); 2471 (Daubert motion); 253 (summary judgment motion); 262 (Daubert reply); 268 (summary judgment reply).) GreenSky’s motions are DENIED …