Ali

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MOHAMMED USMAN ALI, Case No.: 21-cv-00687-AJB-MSB individually and on behalf of all others 13 similarly situated, ORDER 14 Plaintiff, (Doc. Nos. 84; 85) 15 v. 16 FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP., et al., 17 Defendant.

Before the Court is a motion for final approval of settlement and plan allocation (Doc. No. 83) and a motion for award of attorneys’ fees, expenses, and Plaintiff’s service award (Doc. No. 84), both filed by Plaintiff Gergely Csaba (“Plaintiff”). Defendants Franklin Wireless Corporation, OC Kim and David Brown (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition arguing that the requested attorneys’ fees and expenses are “unduly excessive.” (Doc. No. 88.) The deadline to object to the settlement was August 1, 2024. (See Doc. No. 77.) To date, no objections have been filed or otherwise brought to the Court’s attention. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for final approval (Doc. No. 83), and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff’s 28 …