Puckett

Puckett v. Dyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20241:22-cv-00750California882 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH PUCKETT DYER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00750-KES-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING CONSTRUED MOTION

SEEKING RECUSAL OF MAGISTRATE

v. JUDGE JERRY DYER, et al., (Doc. No. 56) Defendants.

16 On December 12, 2024, pro se Plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Reassignment of Case by Court Clerk” in this closed case. (Doc. No. 56). Therein, Plaintiff alleges that the undersigned knows Defendant Dyer or should know him, requests reassignment of this case, and disqualification of the undersigned. (See generally, Id.). The court construes the motion as a motion seeking recusal of the undersigned. The motion attaches various orders, including the court’s Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference with attachments and the district court’s November 25, 2024 order adopting the undersigned’s findings and recommendations issued on November 13, 2023. (Doc. No. 56 at 3-31).

1 A motion’s “nomenclature is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.