Pfeiffer
(PC) Lokerson v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON LOKERSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01513-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
v. TO AMEND COMPLAINT C. PFEIFFER, FOURTEEN DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
Defendant. (Doc. No. 22) 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, filed on September 3, 2024. (Doc. No. 22, “Motion”). Plaintiff accompanies his Motion with a proposed Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 23). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends the Motion be denied. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his Second Amended Complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. Nos. 13, 15). On March 15, 2024, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations to dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC because it failed to allege a cognizable federal claim. (Doc. No.…