Dreisbach Enterprises, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Container, Inc. dba PCC Logistics and Pacific Transload Systems

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20243:24-cv-07592California2,602 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DREISBACH ENTERPRISES, INC., Case No. 24-cv-07592-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 9, 13 10 PACIFIC COAST CONTAINER, INC.

DBA PCC LOGISTICS AND PACIFIC

11 TRANSLOAD SYSTEMS, Defendant. 12

13 Dreisbach Enterprises, Inc., Coolport Management LLC, Cool Port Oakland, LLC, and 14 Cool Port Oakland Freight, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) sued Pacific Coast Container, Inc. (“PCC”) in state 15 court. After a five-day bench trial, PCC removed the action to federal court on the ground 16 Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act 17 (“FAAAA”), 49 U.S.C. § 14501, and therefore there is federal question subject matter jurisdiction. 18 (Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 2-3.)1 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand and request for 19 attorneys’ fees and costs. (Dkt. No. 9.) Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing, and with 20 the benefit of oral argument on December 19, 2024, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to 21 remand and GRANTS Plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.