Bonilla
Bonilla v. Imperial County Superior Court
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No. 24-cv-01929-BAS-DDL
CDCR #J-48500,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) DENYING MOTIONS TO
PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS (ECF Nos. 4, 7); AND
IMPERIAL COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT, (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendant. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 18 19 On October 15, 2024, Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at California Medical Facility, filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1.) On October 24, 2024, the Court dismissed the action because Plaintiff failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement. (ECF No. 2.) The Court further noted that it would be futile for Plaintiff to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) because he has accumulated more the three “strikes” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Id. at 5–6.) Nonetheless, Plaintiff has now filed two IFP Motions (ECF…