Bonilla

Bonilla v. Imperial County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20243:24-cv-01929California1,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No. 24-cv-01929-BAS-DDL

CDCR #J-48500,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) DENYING MOTIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS (ECF Nos. 4, 7); AND

IMPERIAL COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT, (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendant. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 18 19 On October 15, 2024, Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at California Medical Facility, filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1.) On October 24, 2024, the Court dismissed the action because Plaintiff failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement. (ECF No. 2.) The Court further noted that it would be futile for Plaintiff to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) because he has accumulated more the three “strikes” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Id. at 5–6.) Nonetheless, Plaintiff has now filed two IFP Motions (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.