Jordan Nicholas Sukut v. County of San Bernadino

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20245:23-cv-01480California642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JORDAN NICHOLAS SUKUT, Case No. EDCV 23-1480-WDK (SSC)

Plaintiff

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

COUNTY OF SAN JUDGE BERNARDINO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Docket No. 12), the Motions to Dismiss and Strike filed by Defendants San Bernardino County and San Bernardino County Flood Control District (Docket Nos. 13, 14), Opposition and Reply to the Motions (Docket Nos. 17-19), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report,” Docket No. 28), Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report (“Objections,” Docket No. 29), and the other relevant records on file. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. Although not required, the Court briefly makes the following observations. See United States v. Ramos, 65…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.