Greathouse

Greathouse v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20241:24-cv-00715California3,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

21 Plaintiff initiated this action on June 20, 2024, and filed a signed complaint on July 1, 22 2024. (See Docs. 2, 3, and 4.) On October 3, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and 23 granted him leave to amend. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on November 6, 24 2024. (Doc. 9.) On November 8, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint 25 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and determined that the amended complaint failed to comply 26 with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 10.) 27 The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of 28 service of the Court’s order. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff was expressly warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order, then the Court would recommend dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order and for failure to state a claim. (Id. at 7.) The deadline for Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order. The Court therefore will recommend dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.