Applied Materials, Inc. v. Demaray LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20245:20-cv-09341California7,650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-09341-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

DEMARAY LLC, Re: ECF Nos. 431, 452 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Applied Materials, Inc. (“Applied”) has moved for summary judgment that Applied’s Cirrus and Avenir Chambers (the “Accused Chambers”) do not infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,544,276 (“’276 Patent”) and 7,381,657 (“’657 Patent”) (together, the “Asserted Patents”) based on claim and issue preclusion. Applied’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Applied MSJ”), ECF No. 431. Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Demaray LLC (“Demaray”) opposes the motion and has moved for summary judgment that preclusion does not apply. Demaray’s Opposition to Applied’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (“Demaray MSJ”), ECF No. 452. Both motions are fully briefed. Applied’s

1 The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.