Valverde

Valverde v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20245:24-cv-01911California3,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 E.V., Case No. 24-cv-01911-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARTIN O’MALLEY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 11 Defendants.

Plaintiff E.V. appeals from the final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, which denied his application for disability insurance benefits. The Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. See Dkts. 6-7. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (the “Motion” at Dkt. 11-1). I. BACKGROUND In July 2019, Plaintiff applied for Title II disability insurance benefits, alleging a disability onset date of January 15, 2019. See AR 361. Defendant denied Plaintiff’s application on December 10, 2019, and request for reconsideration of that denial on May 6, 2020. See id. at 182- 87, 189-94. Plaintiff then returned to work on May 17, 2020, and requested a hearing before an …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.