(HC) Rollarson v. On Habeas Corpus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20241:24-cv-01536California1,373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEVELAND ROLLARSON, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-01536-SKO (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO CASE ) v. ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO ) DISMISS PETITION 14 ) UNNAMED, ) [21-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] ) Respondent. ) ) 17

19 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is currently in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) serving a sentence of life without possibility of parole for his 1986 convictions in Merced County for first degree murder, robbery, and kidnapping. (Doc. 1.) Petitioner challenges the state courts’ process and determination that he is not entitled to resentencing pursuant to California Penal Code § 1170. Upon review of the petition, it is clear that Petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief. Therefore, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.