Marsh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE MARSH, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-01304-CDB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR E-FILING PRIVILEGES

v. (Doc. 10) FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is the motion of pro se Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) for permission to participate in electronic case filing, filed on December 13, 2024. (Doc. 10). Plaintiffs request permission to use the court’s electronic filing system because “[f]iling by online services makes it easier and fast and sufficient to get documents to courts in a timely manner and saves Plaintiffs monetarily for filing in court in- person and by mail.” (Id. at 1). In their filing, Plaintiffs also express their view that “[t]his case is a State case which derives from an Estoppel due to broken contract and therefore should stay as a State status and heard in the State court.” (Id. at 1-2). Generally, “self-represented litigants…