DiManno
Amazing Ins., Inc. v. DiManno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMAZING INSURANCE, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01349-DAD-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING THE FILING OF
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
MICHAEL A. DIMANNO, et al.,
Defendants.
16 ACCUIRE LLC, et al., 17 Counter-Claimants, 18 v. 19 AMAZING INSURANCE, INC., et al., 20 Counter-Defendants.
22 The court issues this order as a result of its sua sponte review of subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Here, subject matter jurisdiction is purportedly founded upon diversity jurisdiction. However, as the court mentioned at the recent Final Pretrial Conference held in this and a consolidated case, it now appears to the court that the parties may not be diverse. ///// A review of plaintiff’s operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) in this action reflects that plaintiff has failed to allege subject matter jurisdiction. (See Doc. No. 6.) Plaintiff filed its FAC on July 23, 2019, and alleges therein that plaintiff is a citizen of the state of…