K.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIMON THORNTON, No. 2:22-cv-1882 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DEB K., et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed April 10, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days. The thirty day period has long since expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a district judge to this case. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 27 …