Babcock

(PC) Anderson v. Babcock

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20242:23-cv-02779California279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE ANDERSON, No. 2:23-cv-2779 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS C. BABCOCK, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed May 29, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file a signed complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff was warned that his failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day deadline has long since passed, and plaintiff has not filed a signed complaint to properly commence this action, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.