(SS)(PS) Evi v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20242:24-cv-00319California4,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEBORAH CONSTANCE EVI, No. 2:24-cv-0319 DC AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is appearing in pro se and seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment be granted. //// ////

SSI is paid to financially needy disabled persons. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a); Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, 537 U.S. 371, 375 (2003) (“Title XVI of the Act, § 1381 et seq., is the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) scheme of benefits for aged, blind, or disabled individuals,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.