(PC) Furlong v. Shasta County Sheriffs Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20242:24-cv-00375California315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA S. FURLONG, No. 2:24-cv-0375 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 By order filed October 30, 2024, plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a district court judge be randomly assigned to this matter. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.