(PS) Gilbert v. Clear Recon Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20242:24-cv-02308California2,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL EDWARD GILBERT, No. 2:24-cv-2308-DC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLEAR RECON CORP, et al. Defendants.

17 On December 16, 2024, plaintiff Paul Edward Gilbert filed a motion for a temporary restraining order under Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 35.) The presiding district judge referred the motion filed on December 16, 2024, to the undersigned for issuance of findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 37.) The motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g) and should be denied because the court cannot issue the requested relief. I. Background Plaintiff Paul Edward Gilbert initiated this action on August 26, 2024, with a fee-paid complaint naming several defendants and bringing claims arising out of an alleged wrongful foreclosure. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges the defendants took a series of unlawful actions 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.