Cleofas Espinosa Malabar v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202420-71952California1,034 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 20 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLEOFAS ESPINOSA MALABAR, No. 20-71952
Petitioner, Agency No. A208-732-471
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 18, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Cleofas Espinosa Malabar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her
appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen
removal proceedings. The IJ ordered Petitioner removed in absentia after she
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). failed to appear for a removal hearing on June 20, 2018. Petitioner contends she
did…