Russian Riverkeeper v. City of Ukiah CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 2024A168090California13,690 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/20/24 Russian Riverkeeper v. City of Ukiah CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

RUSSIAN RIVERKEEPER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A168090, A169390

v. (Mendocino County THE CITY OF UKIAH et al., Super. Ct. No.

SKUKCVPT202074612)

Defendants and Respondents.

The City of Ukiah (the City) operated a landfill from 1955 to 2001. After ceasing operations and considering for many years how to go about closing the landfill in a manner consistent with regulatory requirements, the City selected a cover system called ClosureTurf, certified an environmental impact report (EIR), and approved the proposed closure. Appellants Russian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.