Saydman

Saydman v. Aegis Security Insurance Company CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 2024G063209California4,071 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 12/20/24 Saydman v. Aegis Security Insurance Company CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

BRENT SAYDMAN,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063209

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2019- 01096355)

AEGIS SECURITY INSURANCE

COMPANY, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Nathan R. Scott, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Dale Washington and Dale E. Washington for Plaintiff and Appellant. Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester, John Hochhausler and Mark R. Wilson for Defendant and Respondent. Appellant Brent Saydman and his mother, Shirley Saydman,1 brought this action against defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.