Roberts

Roberts v. Studio 15

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20243:24-cv-01329California2,085 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 24-CV-1329 JLS (SBC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO STUDIO 15, et al.,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (ECF No. 3);

16 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF

18 No. 1); AND 19 (3) DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL (ECF No. 2)

22 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1), Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 3), and Request for Appointment of Counsel (“Counsel Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s submissions and the law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion, DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint, and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Counsel Motion. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.