Trejo

Trejo v. California Forensic Medical Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20243:20-cv-01465California1,975 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JOSE TREJO, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-1465-DDL 11 Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE

12 v. [Dkt. Nos. 206, 207]

CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL

GROUP,

Defendant. 16 Before the Court are motions in limine filed by Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 207) and Defendant California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. (“CFMG”) (Dkt. No. 206). The Court heard argument at the Pretrial Conference on September 6, 2024. This Order follows. I. LEGAL STANDARDS “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance testimony or evidence in a particular area.” United States v. Heller, 551 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2009). “Denial of a motion in limine does not necessarily mean that all evidence contemplated by the motion will be admitted at trial.” Matrix Int’l Textile, Inc, v. Monopoly Textile, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-0084-FMO-AJW, 2017 WL 2929377, at *1 (C.D. Cal. May 14, 2017) (citation omitted). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.