Minichino
Minichino v. La Rosa
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIE MINICHINO, Case No. 24-cv-04048-LJC
Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
v. FOR DISMISSAL
LEO LA ROSA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 5 Defendants.
The undersigned magistrate judge previously granted pro se Plaintiff Marie Minichino’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, reviewed the sufficiency of Minichino’s Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and ordered Minichino to show cause why her Complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 5. Minichino’s response was due August 22, 2024. Id. at 1, 7. That deadline has passed, and no response has been filed. Although the copy of the Order to Show Cause that the Clerk mailed to Minichino was returned with an indication that she no longer lived at the address provided, ECF No. 8,1 a pro se plaintiff is responsible for providing Court with an accurate and current mailing address. Civ. L.R. 3-11; Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,…