Goldup

Goldup v. The City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20243:24-cv-00602California2,647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARRETT MICHAEL GOLDUP, Case No.: 24-cv-602-RSH-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, [ECF No. 21] Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss by defendant City of San Diego (the “City” or “Defendant”), directed to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) of plaintiff Garrett Michael Goldup. ECF No. 21. As set forth below, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. This Lawsuit On March 28, 2024, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his complaint in this action along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 1. The Court granted the IFP motion but determined that the complaint failed to state a claim, and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 3. // On May 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed the FAC, his operative complaint. ECF No. 4. The FAC’s single claim is brought under Title II of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.