Ramirez

Ramirez v. Val

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20243:24-cv-02969California759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIAS TORRES RAMIREZ, Case No. 4:24-cv-02969-KAW

Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS CASE; ORDER

v. REASSIGNING CASE TO A DISTRICT

JUDGE

VAL, et al., Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 5,

12 On May 16, 2024, Plaintiff Ramirez filed this case against Defendants Val, et al. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff also moved to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP Application"). (Dkt. No. 2.) On May 30, 2024, the Court considered the second IFP application to be the operative one and denied it without prejudice because it was incomplete to the point where the undersigned could not determine whether Plaintiff qualified for IFP status. (Dkt. No. 5 at 1.) Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended IFP application or pay the filing fee by June 21, 2024. Id. Plaintiff did not file an amended IFP application or pay the filing fee as ordered. On June 26, 2024, the Court issued an order to show cause, in which Plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.