Zarkesh

Zarkesh v. Vinmar Polymers America LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20243:24-cv-06618California812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

1 2 3 4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE NOUSHIN ZARKESH, CASE NO. C23-1002-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. VINMAR POLYMERS AMERICA, LLC and

VINMAR INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend her complaint (Dkt. No. 56) and to transfer venue (Dkt. No. 55), along with Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 47). Having thoroughly considered the briefing and the relevant record, and for the reasons described below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend and to transfer (Dkt. Nos. 55, 56) and DENIES as moot Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 47). The Court described the facts of this employment breach of contract case, at least as originally alleged, in prior orders. (See Dkt. Nos. 21, 31.) Plaintiff now asks for leave to amend her complaint and to transfer this matter to the Northern District of California. (See generally Dkt. Nos. 55, 56.) She seeks to revise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.