Refuerzo

Refuerzo v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20243:22-cv-00868California7,189 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RORESTE REFUERZO, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00868-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., Re: Dkt. No. 97 Defendant.

12 Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against Southwest for penalizing flight attendants’ exercise of family and medical leave. (Dkt. No. 84.) Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. (Dkt. No. 97.) Having carefully considered the briefing, and with the benefit of oral argument on September 5, 2024, the Court CERTIFIES Plaintiffs’ claims for FMLA interference, wrongful termination, and unfair competition as to the (b)(2) Nationwide Injunctive Relief Class, (b)(2) California Subclass, and (b)(3) Nationwide Damages Class. Plaintiffs’ motion as to the (b)(3) California Subclass is DENIED for failure to establish numerosity. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations Plaintiffs allege Southwest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.