Siguenza

Siguenza v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20244:23-cv-06006California5,264 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARLON EDGARDO SIGUENZA, Case No. 23-cv-06006-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE;

DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND; DENYING MOTION TO

CDCR, et al., RELATE Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Correctional Training Facility, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This order also denies Plaintiff’s motion to relate. Dkt. No. 5. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.