Monte Beard v. Connolly-Pacific Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20242:24-cv-07583California2,222 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-7583 PA (Ex) Date September 10, 2024 Title Monte Beard v. Connolly-Pacific Co.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — COURT ORDER

Before the Court is a Notice of Removal (“NOR”) filed by defendant Connolly-Pacific Co. (“Defendant”). (Docket No. 1.) Defendant asserts that this Court possesses federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 based on the preemption provided by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that Defendant has failed to plausibly allege that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Federal courts are courts of limited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.