Martinez

Martinez v. Nienow

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20243:23-cv-02338California10,776 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENDA MARTINEZ; PEDRO Case No.: 3:23-cv-02338-RBM-AHG BERNAL; and A.B., a minor, by and 12 through her Guardian ad Litem, ORDER William J. Phippard, (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING Plaintiffs,

IN PART THE INDIVIDUAL

vs. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

M.D. SHALON NIENOW; M.D. (2) DENYING RADY’S MOTION TO

SARAH VEGA; M.D. NATALIE

DISMISS

LAUB; RADY CHILDREN’S

HOSPITAL; COUNTY OF SAN [Docs. 38, 37]

DIEGO; SOCIAL WORKER 1;

19 SOCIAL WORKER 2; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 22 On December 27, 2023, Plaintiffs Brenda Martinez (“Martinez”), Pedro Bernal (“Bernal”), and A.B., a minor, by and thought her Guardian ad Litem, William J. Phippard, (“Minor A.B.”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint for Damages (“Complaint”) against Shalon Nienow, M.D. (“Nienow”); Sarah Vega, M.D. (“Vega”); Natalie Laub, 27 28 M.D. (“Laub”); and Rady Children’s Hospital …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.