Sos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ROBERT SOS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00459-GPC-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND

v.

DISCOVERY DEADLINE

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, et al., [ECF No. 17] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 17. The parties seek an order from the Court continuing the fact discovery deadline. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 7 at 8 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts.…