In Re: Jordana Marinkovic Bauman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20243:24-cv-01564California408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE: JORDANA M. BAUMAN, Case No.: 3:24-CV-1564 JLS (BLM)

Debtor,

ORDER ON APPELLANT’S

MOTION TO CLARIFY STATUS

AFTER BANKRUPTCY FILING

15 MEL MARIN, (ECF No. 17) Appellant,

MICHAEL KOCH, Appellee.

20 Presently before the Court is Appellant Mel Marin’s Motion titled “Appellant’s Notice of and Motion to Clarify Status After Bankruptcy Filing” (“Mot.,” ECF No. 17). Appellant indicates he filed for bankruptcy on December 9, 2024, and “asks if this case is stayed because only the bankruptcy trustee has standing to prosecute this appeal against Mr. Koch et al, under the rule in [Lane v. Vitek Real Estate Industries Group], 713 F. Supp. 2d 1092, 1097 (E.D. Cal. 2010).” Mot. at 1. The Court notes that in Lane, the court held, “[i]f plaintiffs were in bankruptcy they clearly would lack standing to bring this action absent abandonment of their claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.