Verduzco

Verduzco v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20243:24-cv-01972California3,593 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CESAR SANTOS VERDUZCO, Case No.: 24cv1972-RSH (BJC)

CDCR #BW-0724,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

CDCR, RJD, CORRECTIONAL

AND

OFFICERS TRILLO, REED,

MASSCARO AND MAZA, (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b) 18 19 Plaintiff Cesar Santos Verduzco, a state inmate incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1-2. I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55, 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.