Andrade

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20245:24-cv-07434California573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EMANUEL RODRIGUEZ ANDRADE, Case No. 24-cv-07434-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER SUA SPONTE GRANTING

PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME

v. TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS

APPLICATION OR PAY FILING FEE;

C.D.C.R, DIRECTIONS TO CLERK Defendant.

12 Plaintiff commenced this action on or about October 24, 2024, when he filed with the Court a pleading tiled “Truth Affidavit.” Dkt. No. 1. That same day, the Court sent him deficiency notices, informing him that the action could not proceed without Plaintiff (1) filing a complaint on the proper form, and (2) either filing an in forma pauperis application or paying the filing fee. Dkt. Nos. 2, 3. The Court instructed Plaintiff to correct these deficiencies by November 21, 2024, or this action would be dismissed. Id. Plaintiff has corrected one of these deficiencies as he has filed a complaint on the proper form. Dkt. No. 7. However, Plaintiff has neither filed an in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.