Cadriel

Cadriel v. Wolfspeed, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20245:24-cv-05314California4,069 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RICKY CADRIEL, Case No. 24-cv-05314-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND

v.

WOLFSPEED, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 29 Defendants.

Plaintiff Ricky Cadriel brings this putative class action against his former employers, Defendants Wolfspeed, Inc. and Edgar Bustamante, for various state law wage and hour violations. Defendants removed the action to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). Not. of Removal, ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand on the basis that Defendants have failed to establish the requisite amount in controversy. Mot., ECF No. 14. The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ricky Cadriel is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.