In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20243:22-cv-03580California1,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)

LITIGATION

___________________________________

ORDER RE NOVEMBER 12, 2024

This Document Relates To: DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE PLAINTIFFS' COMMUNICATIONS 10 All Actions. Re: Dkt. No. 688

12 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute concerning Meta’s requests for emails reflecting plaintiffs’ disclosures, if any, to non-Meta recipients of information concerning their doctors, conditions, or treatments. Dkt. No. 688. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Meta contends that emails showing that plaintiffs “disclosed their allegedly sensitive health information to broad groups of third parties” are relevant to questions of (1) whether plaintiffs considered that information confidential and had a reasonable expectation it would remain private, (2) whether the alleged intrusion on any such expectation was sufficiently serious to support their claims,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.