In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20243:22-cv-03580California895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)

LITIGATION

___________________________________ REDACTED

This Document Relates To: ORDER RE NOVEMBER 19, 2024

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

10 All Actions. Re: Dkt. No. 694

12 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute concerning plaintiffs’ Requests for Production (“RFPs”) Nos. 163 and 164. Dkt. No. 694. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The parties included RFPs 163 and 164 in an earlier discovery dispute letter filed on September 13, 2024. See Dkt. No. 625. Because the parties did not explain their respective positions or provide any basis for the Court to resolve their disagreements regarding these requests, the Court ordered the parties to “confer about these specific disputes and file a joint discovery dispute letter addressing the specific disputes by November 19, 2024.” Dkt. No. 685 at 4. According to Meta, the parties did not confer about…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.