Stevens

Stevens v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20243:23-cv-06289California6,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LORA S., Case No. 23-cv-06289-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 18 Commissioner of Social Security, 11 Defendant.

13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Lora S. moves for summary judgment to reverse the decision of Defendant Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, denying her claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. ECF No. 12. Defendant cross-moves to affirm. ECF No. 18. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the matter is submitted without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion and DENIES Defendant’s cross- motion.2 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On June 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed an application for Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income benefits with a disability onset date of June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.