Greenspan

Greenspan v. Musk

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20243:24-cv-04647California392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AARON JACOB GREENSPAN, Case No. 24-cv-04647-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARINGS ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO v. STRIKE/DISMISS; DENYING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR

ELON MUSK, et al., LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY

Defendants.

13 Before the Court are the following motions, each filed September 30, 2024: (1) 14 defendant X Corp.'s "Motion to Strike or, Alternatively, Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims Against 15 X Corp. Asserted in the Amended Complaint"; (2) defendant Morgan Stanley & Company, 16 LLC's "Special Motion to Strike and Dismiss First Amended Complaint"; and (3) 17 defendants Elon Musk, Tesla, Inc., the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003, 18 Excession, LLC, Jared Birchall, Singer Cashman LLP, Allison Huebert, Adam S. 19 Cashman, Adam G. Mehes, and Alex Spiro's "Motion to Strike or, Alternatively, Dismiss 20 Plaintiff’s Claims." Plaintiff has filed an "Omnibus Opposition" as well as a "Corrected 21 Plaintiff's Omnibus…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.