Cambell

Manuel DeJesus Flores v. Cambell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20245:24-cv-02598California247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL DEJESUS FLORES, No. 2:24-cv-3350-CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER CAMBELL, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Riverside County Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s application are more readily available in Riverside County, which is located in the Central District of California. See id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This Court has not ruled on petitioner’s application to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.