Holston

Holston v. Sierra Pacific Orthopaedic Center Medical Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20241:24-cv-00681California317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT HOLSTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00681-KES-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

THE COURT TO TERMINATE

v. DEFENDANT SIERRA PACIFIC

ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER MEDICAL

SIERRA PACIFIC ORTHOPAEDIC GROUP, INC. AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS CENTER MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al., ACTION 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 17, 18) 16 On December 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed two notices of dismissal of Defendant Sierra Pacific Orthopaedic Center Medical Group, Inc. with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF Nos. 17, 18.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)). Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.