Cheek

(PC) Stokes v. Cheek

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20241:24-cv-00691California1,979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWONE STOKES, Case No. 1:24-cv-0691-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER FINDING PLAINTIFF MAY

PROCEED ON COGNIZABLE CLAIMS

v. (ECF No. 18) MS. CHEEK, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Antwone Stokes (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend or to notify the Court that he was willing to proceed on cognizable claims. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint which is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 18.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.