Dowling

(PS) Marshall v. Dowling

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20241:24-cv-01167California2,444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MIRANDA MARSHALL, Case No. 1:24-cv-01167-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO (1)

ASHLYN T. BERT DOWLING, et al., COMPLY WITH RULE 8(a); (2) ESTABLISH

SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION; (3)

Defendants. FOLLOW A COURT ORDER AND

PROSECUTE THIS CASE; AND (4) UPDATE

PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS

(ECF No. 5) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

18 Plaintiff Miranda Marshall proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (ECF Nos. 1, 4). Although it is difficult to understand, the complaint appears to allege that items were stolen from Plaintiff. On October 9, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and concluded that it violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) and lacked a basis for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.