Dowling
(PS) Marshall v. Dowling
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20241:24-cv-01167California2,444 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MIRANDA MARSHALL, Case No. 1:24-cv-01167-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE
v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO (1)
ASHLYN T. BERT DOWLING, et al., COMPLY WITH RULE 8(a); (2) ESTABLISH
SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION; (3)
Defendants. FOLLOW A COURT ORDER AND
PROSECUTE THIS CASE; AND (4) UPDATE
PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS
(ECF No. 5) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
18 Plaintiff Miranda Marshall proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (ECF Nos. 1, 4). Although it is difficult to understand, the complaint appears to allege that items were stolen from Plaintiff. On October 9, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and concluded that it violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) and lacked a basis for…