Doerer

(PC) Papazian v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20241:24-cv-01182California1,587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES MICHAEL PAPAZIAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-01182-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILING TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

J.DOERER,

JANUARY 17, 2025 DEADLINE

Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner incarcerated at United States Penitentiary, Atwater, proceeds on his pro se amended civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics1 and the Federal Torts Claim Act (“FTCA”). (Doc. No. 4, “amended complaint”). Upon review of the amended complaint, it appears Plaintiff did avail himself of the administrative remedies available through the Bureau of Prison (“BOP”) prior to filing suit. A failure to exhaust administrative remedies is fatal to a prisoner’s complaint. Prior to recommending dismissal of this action, the Court will afford Plaintiff an opportunity to show cause why the Court should dismiss the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.